| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: [OS2HW] Vid quality |
In , on 01/22/07
at 09:44 AM, mwizard99{at}comcast.net said:
>In , on 01/22/07
> at 09:32 AM, "Derek W. Keoughan" said:
>>inkleput{at}isp.com wrote:
>>> I fed the second vid output from my T42 to my stand alone
17" LCD. The
>>> T42 is a 15" and had the most basic video card for that
year. Both are
>>> always set at the default/native resolution of 1024 x 768. Everything
>>> worked straight up. No searching for bits and pieces or setting odd
>>> settings.
>>>
>>> But the quality of the 17" display was pretty bad. It had the
>>> appearance almost of printing done on poor or damp paper that let the
>>> ink bleed out from the edges of the characters a little. Just fuzzy,
>>> diffused edges. Very bad compared to what it does very crisply with my
>>> desktop - it's normal operation.
>>>
>>> If the T42 had had the second or third step up in card quality would
>>> this diffused look have been eliminated, or is this a driver problem?
>>External VGA should match your laptop screen, with perhaps slight
>>blurring if you're using extremely long VGA cables (as is often the case
>>with KVM switches, especially ones with cheap cables).
>>Your external panel may also be a slower refresh design than the
>>built-in laptop screen, which would cause ghosting and blurriness,
>>especially on fast-moving images.
>>Can't speak for the T42, as I have no experience with it, but perhaps
>>it's a full-digital display, while the external VGA port would be
>>digital (video memory) to analog (the signal down the cable) to digital
>>(within the external panel), so there's some loss of sharpness in the
>>double conversion.
>>You're also comparing a 15" LCD and a 17" LCD at the same native
>>resolution - the pixel size on the 17" would be bigger, which
would also
>>introduce some graininess.
>>Hope this helps!
>>-Derek
>Perhaps you can recall that the LCD screens display less than stellar
>results when used at their non-native resolution? I have not heard that
>this problem has been resolved yet.
As I said:
>>> Both are always set at the default/native resolution of 1024 x 768.
JimL
--
"Feel inadequate? Destroy stuff and kill people." Confucious,
Socrates, Benjamin Franklin
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/os2hardware/
Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/os2hardware/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
To change settings via email:
mailto:os2hardware-digest{at}yahoogroups.com
mailto:os2hardware-fullfeatured{at}yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
os2hardware-unsubscribe{at}yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
---
* Origin: Waldo's Place USA Internet Gateway (1:3634/1000)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 3634/1000 12 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.