| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | 802.11 wireless |
Are we having fun yet? I have been experimenting with waveguide antenna, and have had generally good results with most variations (except the one made with aluminium flyscreen), but have begun having second thoughts about the connectors I am using. My first attempt seems to have had the best reults, despite (or perhaps because) using an "F" type (TV) 75 ohm connector on the waveguide itself. Most designs I have seen so far suggest an "N" connector and a few use BNC. "N" fittings are not available locally except by special order, and I judged BNC to be too prone to deterioration from the pervasive moisture through much of the year, and salt spray of winter storms (the ocean may only about 100' away and upwind at high tide in a storm). The only threaded fitting easily available here for 50 ohm cable was a "PL 255" (is this a "P" type connector?) as is used on CB and VHF radios. When I converted to the "PL 255" from the "F" connector, I seem to have lost about half my signal strength. Is this indeed the cause, or am I just contending with the overabundance of maple leaves that appeared with spring. Will BNC connections be any better? How much risk do I run of damaging the transmitter if I return to using 75 ohm connectors? Any thoughts? ... It could be worse ... Paul --- Msged/LNX 6.1.1* Origin: Unwired on the 49th (1:153/401.3) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 153/401 307 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.