Hello Bj”rn.

08 Nov 06 19:15, you wrote to me:


 NS>>>>>  The question was about your nuts.
 GP>>>> That's YOU'RE nuts. . .
 GP>>>> Yes, homophones are hard, I agree!

 NS>>>  f ­¥ ¯®­¨¬ î ⥡ï, „¦®à¤¦.. •®âï, ç¥áâ­®¥ á«®¢®, áâ àîáì..

 MG>>  n#~ ####### ##   ## ## ## ## n#####n n#####n ##  n## ## ## ~#n
 MG>> ##     Þ#Ý   ##nnn## ## ## ## ##nnn## ##      ##n##~  ## ##   ##
 MG>> ##     Þ#Ý   ##~~~## ## ## ## ##~~~## ##      ##~##n  ~~ ~~   ##
 MG>>  ~#n   Þ#Ý   ##   ## ~######~ ##   ## ~#####~ ##  ~## ## ## n#~

 MG>> Keep the drivel readable, you sorry backsliding excuse for
 MG>> newbie-meat...

 BF> I could say the same about the above drivel but being the one I am I
 BF> don't so you just keep the good work up.

 BF> {at}CHRS: IBMPC 2
 BF> {at}CODEPAGE: 850

I'm not responsible for the stoopidity of your Uro-pee-in software. Get
yourself a real reader, or at least a real codeset, if you want to see
things the way they're supposed to be.

Golded has this to say about it:

"WARNING: You should only change this from IBMPC if you have a
complete set of .CHS and .ESC files that translate to and from your
physical character set. In other words, if you are using codepage
850 and want 100% correct translation, you must be sure that you
have 850_ISO.CHS, ISO_850.CHS, etc. etc."

 BF> A # is better than nothing. And I really love those
 BF> ~~~ ~~~. They make you look god.

Remember, in this echo, I /am/ god...

 BF>  But how the heck did you do
 BF> those Ý ?



Acting!

--- GoldED/W32 3.0.1