> Is the target system's software being too pedantic?

DN> If it complies with specification, no.

PE> Poor old Rod.

RS> Now try explaining why the date thats out of
RS> spec has continued for so long. Poor old Paul.

PE> Poor old Rod.  Because no-one has raised a PC, obviously.

Poor old Paul, hasnt even grasped that you CANT raise
a PC in Daves case. Coz it doesnt happen to be Fido.

You DO realise that POLICY4 only applys to Fido dont you ?

GREAT footshot, you can fall over now that you have blown BOTH feet off.

RS> Unfortunately for you, the real world is just a tad more
RS> complicated than your mindlessly anal obscessive ideas allow for.

PE> Poor old Rod.  I get a direct quote from DN saying
PE> exactly what I said all along, and you're still madly
PE> trying to fake away that he said no such thing. Poor old Rod.

More lies, THAT message SPECIFICALLY refers to 'serious problems for
the network' and since thats been going for YEARS that cant be true.

Poor old Paul, say hello to Deng Shoa Ping. Hope you dont get
too much dirt into the wounds at the end of your legs now |-)
@EOT:

---