Craig Hutchison (3:634/383) wrote to Steven Horn at 06:21 on 09 Nov 2002:

 CH> I was simply saying that complying only with *selected* parts of
 CH> policy is just an excuse.

One tries to comply with the entire policy document but some parts will
affect a node's operation more than others.  If that is the case, one has
to name that part and that part only. 


 CH> I will if you like. P4 is outmoded and outdated. It doesn't need
 CH> revision. It needs to be replaced with something that covers where
 CH> Fido is not only today, but is heading in the future.

I won't disagree but don't expect that to happen soon.:-)
 
Take care,

Steven Horn (steven_a_horn{at}yahoo.ca)
Moderator, ALASKA_CHAT 

--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+