DB>DB>Now name the company that originated v.32terbo.
DB> CB> AT&T.  I don't remember what year, but it was definitly AT&T and
DB> CB> not USR or Hayes or Rockwell.  And they made their improvment
DB>Really?  I had better tell those callers to my system who were using 
several
DB>brands of 19200 modems that they weren't connecting at 16800 or 19200 
(AT&T,
???  Who said anything about whether somebody connected at 16.8k or
19.2k?  You were talking about USR (vs. Rockwell) and v.32terbo as if
they had done it.  They didn't.  AT&T did.  The only contribution USR
made at all was to take AT&T's public domain v.32terbo and come out with
a proprietary extension to v.32terbo but still call it 'v.32terbo', as
if it was all theirs, or still the same old method that everybody else
was doing.  And they publicized it as if they had created v.32terbo and
that everybody's v.32terbo was the same. They didn't.  They just created
their own extension.  And USRs version was not the same as those by any
other maker.
All USR did was to create an incompatible extension with the same name,
and to confuse the protocol naming situation.
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0162
---------------