FA> Not everyone reports things for fame and fortune, as we have had
 FA> so many cries of "wolf" what  would be  the point, you are not going
 FA> to make the headlines or  even the  evening news. In a media hungry
 FA> world, well  UFO sightings  are way  back there behind delicious
 FA> scandals and sex.   Why skeptics  thing everyone  who has a story
 FA> is out for fame or hoax makes  no sense.   Actually most people
 FA> are too busy trying to make a living and survive than to bother
 FA> to  create or even think about UFOs. So sometimes when a simple
 FA> story  comes along, it could be the genuine article......
       The word skeptic is a misnomer.  Many 'skeptics' are so convinced on 
the issue that they become very sloppy with the information, and it makes 
them no better than the most fervent U.F.O believers.   The systematic 
'skeptics' have there own niche and the isolation allows this carelessness to 
fly.  All I was pointing out to you is that you must still consider their
doubts and a single person report evidently is not too convincing.  This is 
regardless of whether the event did or did not happen.
... One Buchanan beats a Bush hiding a Quayle any day.
--- FMail 1.22
---------------