II> You can feel free to say that they were imagining things,
 II> but you will
 II> never convince _ME_ that it didn't happen that way!  They
 II> appeared to be
 II> completely sober, and weren't the type to use "recreational
 II> drugs."
 I can not judge what happened on that day, the fact is that an 
extraterrestrial event is not impossible, so you could be completely accurate 
in your interpretation of what happen that day.  All I was saying is that 
these types of documentations are not very useful, when the extraordinary 
nature of the subject requires extremely strong evidence.
 I am completely unsure on the matter.  You look at events like Tehran 76 and 
any conventional explanation fails (to date) to explain the event.  This 
involves strong evidence, yet if you ask me if it was an alien craft, I could 
never answer that it was - its just so extraordinary.  On the other hand, I 
could not dismiss it as a meteor and Jupiter playing tricks on the pilots 
because this hypothesis completely fails under the fastest examination.
 So what does one do?  Well, we had an idea here of an automated video system 
with various detectors to separate out the human air traffic (ie. neutron 
emissions are produced from fusion processes).  Anyhow, this requires some 
time to do but we will get around to it.  I'll never be convinced until I see 
it for my self.  I even think the department will allow us to do it under a 
different title.  We currently spending 6 week investigating if 
sonoluminescence produces x-rays which is fairly new research (SL is an 
effect where bubbles in water emit light in due to high frequency sound being 
directed through the water).  The next project is a new railgun design a 
friend and I have been looking at.  The armed forces takes this stuff very 
seriously and the department will give as 6 months to build it.  Then I was 
hoping to get this surveillance system going.
       Regards George
... The truth, if you recognize, will clear out your sinuses.
--- FMail 1.22
---------------