From: Bill Lucy 

In article <390269b1$1{at}w3.nls.net>, richhong{at}hawksci.com says...
> >> First, I do understand that there was no warrant for the entry.
>
> John,
>
> I don't think you need one to enforce an order already issued.  There was no
> arrest being made; this was enforcement of a lawful and proper ruling that
> the boy should be reunited with his father.

That's right, Rich. The family was already in violation of existing law.
Therefore, no warrant was necessary.

It's a sad state of affairs where something this heinous has to occur.



--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5