-> In a message of 26 Apr 98 KEITH MORGAN wrote to me:
->  KM> things on tape that were nerver thought possible before. And when 
these
->  KM> same objects use to be caught on film by amateurs, that too was
->  KM> dismissed.  But sightings by hundreds of witnesses all with video
->  KM> cameras can't be dismissed, and that's what happened in 1990 in 
Mexico.
->  KM> I have heard some of the dumb explanations for this mass sighting, 
nd
->  KM> none hold water.
-> I also have to wonder if the elongation is not just motion blur. And is it 
-> the motion of the object or the camera?
   As I said in another message, there are refernce objects in most of
these videos, and it is the object, not the camera that is moving.
-> Now I don't have an answer to the hundreds of witnesses, except to doubt 
the 
-> veracity of the reporters.
    Each witness had their own camcorder.  That means there are hundreds
of tapes to backup the witnesses, so the reporter's veracity is
irrelevent. Talk to some people from Mexico, or Hawaii, they will tell
you the real deal.  There is something going on, and just because it is
happening outside of everyone else's abilities to experience it first
hand, doesn't mean it's not real.  Have you experienced a Space Shuttle
launch first hand?  Does it mean that it's not real. What's the veracity
of the reporters that show you the launch? Can you trust what they are
telling you?  The reporters said the FACE on Mars was just a pile of
rocks after the first raw photo was released, and that's not science
when you rush to judgement like that.  Well, I can tell you for a fact
that they were wrong, but they already have the public accepting this
conclusion while evidence is slowly being revealed that these object are
clearly artificial.  But the damage is done, because everyone is under a
false impression.  The reporters that spit that lie out didn't know what
they were looking at, and NASA never told them what they were looking
at, they just let them look at a photo taken under bad conditions, and
at a angle looking back at the FACE, and not from over head as in the
original Viking photos.  You couldn't recognize your own mother under
those conditions.  The FACE has now been orthographically correct to the
extent of verifing the its construction.  Take a good look before you
too follow the masses in the wrong direction.
-> I am willing to be convinced, but I'm not being taken without a
struggle...
->  
   Ok, that's good, keep on struggling, but at the same time watch the
next unfolding events at the same time.  There are some things that will
shake everybody up.
s
--- Big Ted 1.2 for Wildcat/5
---------------