LP>Your putting right-wing in with Libertarian, and anarchist in with
LP>leftist and socialist is curious. I would put right-wing in the
LP>same group as socialist/leftist/communist/ authoritarian. As
I noted it the first time I read it, maybe should have pointed it out.
Methinks he got them reversed. Should have been
Libertarian/capitalist/anarchist and leftist/socialist.
People get pissed when I tell them that the current
constituency of what they call the 'democratic party' are not really human
beings, but sheep with an attitude problem. Neither do they understand
(actually, I think they do, but they're faking it) it when I tack things like
'mob rule' and tyranny onto democracy. I'm picking on democrats because
they're easy targets. ;-).
Political systems are intriguing. Throughout my whole life, I cannot
name one example of any issue or contest that did not boil down to
namecalling or the 'me-first' attitude.
--- Ezycom V1.10
---------------
* Origin: TechNet-1 Prime - An Engineering Syst (1:110/515)
|