Doc O'Leary wrote on 12/21/2017 1:01 PM:
> For your reference, records indicate that
> rickman  wrote:
>
>> No, you started on a tangent of modifying the phone hardware.
>
> No, I simply mentioned that one of the strengths of using an RPi is that
> it allows hardware interfaces beyond what most mobile devices support.
> That’s not a tangent at all; if you wanted the topic to be about *your*
> personal tastes, you would have given more details in the original post.

 From your first post here...

> But it’s a
> fool’s errand to try to do pretty much *anything* with mobile devices
> that involves hardware modification or any kind of external interface



>>> when you seem to want to have
>>> nothing to do with the topic you yourself raised.  So get your
>>> thinking straight.  If you want to talk bare metal, talk bare metal in
>>> a different thread.
>>
>> You seem to have anger management issues.
>
> There’s no anger in my simple statements.  You’re projecting.

"Simple" statements like "your reading comprehension is quite low" and
"clearly and abundantly trollish".  All the while the problem was that you
couldn't be bothered to have read the thread!


>> You know the best way to handle a troll, right?  DON"T REPLY!!!!
>
> I wasn’t sure you were a troll rather than someone who has a bit of a
> muddled mind that needed correcting.  Are you outright admitting to
> trolling the group?  You certainly don’t seem that interested in using
> an RPi for anything, or really even a cheap mobile device.  If you
> can’t get back on topic even when prompted to do so, I’ll be happy to
> killfile you.

I wish you had long ago.  I won't be responding further.  I have made my
points.

--

Rick C

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
on the centerline of totality since 1998

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05