| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Dropping FTS-0001? Why bother? |
> There's no reason to make YooHoo the "minimum handshake" -- > we've already got one. Just like we already have a standard for EchoMail packaging, so why have there been so many arguments for a better method/standard than FTS-4? And why on earth would we want to create a better enveloping/packet type than what's already defined in FTS-1? ---* Origin: Absolute Solutions (2:270/17.6) SEEN-BY: 10/8 1650 11/157 13/13 50/99 54/54 104/821 105/69 103 330 115/2 SEEN-BY: 124/5125 153/920 170/400 201/505 209/720 770 260/1 261/1023 270/101 SEEN-BY: 270/102 103 280/1 282/1 332/1 353/218 357/1 396/1 620/243 632/348 SEEN-BY: 640/75 201 206 217 305 820 822 823 690/660 711/409 410 413 430 431 SEEN-BY: 711/807 808 809 816 934 712/515 713/888 800/1 1000/1 2605/606 SEEN-BY: 2613/5 3615/50 3619/25 7877/2809 @PATH: 270/17 24/24 396/1 270/101 209/720 640/820 711/409 808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.