RS> Nope, *HE* used that particular word in the original question *YOU*
RS> asked him a long time ago. AND its dead fucking obvious that YOU didnt
RS> even PC on the very clear example of a completely unambiguous breach
RS> of 'the specs' on the date problem, EVEN THO it clearly did 'cause a
RS> problem' for you. You in fact chose to change your code to allow for
RS> it ANYWAY. So you have blown the feet right off your pathetically silly
RS> claim that even something that causes a non serious problem for a single
RS> node is something that its appropriate to PC on. In fact you are faking
RS> away like mad on that because you clearly had enough sense not to do that.

The main reason I chose to not PC was because I realised I was allowed to
just bin the entire message if it was out of spec.

RS> I've binned your mindless juvenalia.

That's all you posted.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---