Hi Paul,

On Wed 2036-Aug-27 19:21, Paul Quinn (3:640/384) wrote to Richard Webb:

PQ> That is does, surely.  As I was editing my reply to Lee, I came upon
PQ> one of those 'Eureka!' moments again.  :)  I kept mis-reading the
PQ> output when searching for those addresses.  They weren't "no-find"
PQ> results, they were actual "find" results!

I find such things happening to me often when creating my
own batch solutions.  I'll be stumbling along trying to
figure out why I"m not getting the results I expect, when
suddenly something unrelated will trigger one of those
eureka moments .  SHould have seen that one myself after
seeing the explanation you provided.  Of course!!!

SInce most node addresses one might wish to look up are not
such admin nodes shouldn't be a problem for most .

I'm still debugging a much simpler batch and know I"ll
stumble onto the same sort of "lightbulb flashes above head"
moment when I figure out why the output isn't doing what I
expect it to.


Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+