RS> That was all in NETMAIL and then he later proceeded to chuck a tantrum
RS> in a public echo, a technical one too, not a chat one, after I let the
RS> air out of his wankier arguments in netmail. So he hasnt got a fucking
RS> hope in hell of sustaining a PC. He's a complete fucking wanker.

You might want to organize all the appropriate evidence, because to do any
action myself would mean destroying the whole philosophy of the BBS, so I'm
going to be betting my node number on it.

RS> And with the latest ruling by the High Court on the implied right to free
RS> speech in the constitution, even fido would want to watch out if they tried
RS> to traduce someones right to free speech on political issues like that.

Is this "latest ruling" the one that was done 5 years ago?  If
there is a "new latest ruling", does that mean that Lolita on the
PC overrides the Qld computer game law, which someone was convicted of,
despite not having any computer games?  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---