On Feb 04 21:58, 1998, David Bowerman of 1:153/290 wrote:
DB> That really doesn't seem to matter to Richard.  He is quite willing to 
DB> blame every other company for any problems with interop with Rockwell 
DB> products. Craig Ford has posted on several occasions about problems with 
DB> Rockwell's implementation of various features.  Richard's only response 
is 
DB> to the effect that every other modem manufacturer is responsible for 
DB> modifing their implementations to allow for Rockwell's idiosyncracies and 
DB> non-standard implementations.
Indeed.  I've commented (snidely) elsewhere that if I were _really_ nasty, 
I'd suggest Rockwell doesn't want to engage in interop testing because they 
(Rockwell) would possibly be put in the unenviable position of having _two_ 
other implementers telling them (Rockwell) that their (Rockwell's) 
implementation was "non compliant".
But, I'm not nasty.  We all know that. :-)
Rick
--- MsgedSQ 3.30
---------------