RS> You really are a pathetic clown Paul boy. You proclaimed
RS> that you were such a programming genius that you were absolutely
RS> guaranteed to be be able to find that QWK2PKT bug in 20 minutes
PE> Actually I said "probably 1 hour", and then mentioned that
PE> this was a conservative estimate, 20 minutes was more likely.
RS> Whoopy fucking do. Still quite remarkably juvenile posturing Paul
RS> boy. And still looks DAMNED silly when contrasted with not being able
RS> notice the switches used to invoke QWK2PKT in the supplied BAT file.
RS> if only you were provided with a single line BAT
RS> file which demonstrated the problem on MY system.
PE> No I didn't. I said if *I* had a reproducable
PE> problem occurring on *MY* system.
RS> Liar, you kept demanding a single line bat file. It just aint ever gunna
Rubbish, Rod. What I said was:
1. If *I* had a reproducible problem on *MY* system, I could fix it in
likely 1 hour, so I was wondering why you didn't fix it on your system
instead of involving me at all, after all you programmed in nappies or
something.
2. I am not willing to debug QWK2PKT AT ALL unless you send a one-line
batch file that demonstrates the problem. I'm not even happy to run the
batch file to even SEE if the problem occurs on my system, unless you do
that basic step.
Poor old Rod. What you really meant was you wet your nappies every time
you attempted to program, right? Senility does that to you, it seems.
BFN. Paul.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|