JK{ RF> JK> Find the articles by Leiber and read them in Scientific
JK{ American. RF> JK> There were others also over the years.  His were
JK{ in the 1970's, I RF> JK> believe.
JK{ RF> You are making the statements.  We have no idea which articles
JK{ you are RF> talking about, so the burden of PROOF stands on you, not
JK{ us.
JK{ No, it doesn't.  You are among the folks who refuse to find out what
JK{ has been going on for twenty years now, ever since the research on
JK{ the human brain was done by the computer people who made the first
JK{ desktop.
You mean Steve Jobs?
JK{ You use the machine and havn't the faintest idea of how it came into
JK{ being, just as you don't have the first clue as to what I am saying.
Well, you have never demonstrated that you have the first clue as to 
what you are saying. You have contradicted yourself severl times (most 
recently when you praised places like Stanford, and then trashed them 
because I told you I have been there to educate them.)
JK{ If you chose to remain ignorant of what is happening, then so be it.
You are the epitome of the old statement that a mind is a terrible thing 
to use.
 * RM 1.31  * Eval Day 16 * It is hereditary in my family to have no 
hildren.
--- Platinum Xpress/Wildcat! v1.3
---------------