On (23 Nov 02) Michael Grant wrote to Janis Kracht...

Hello Michael,

 MG> I would look to it as something that the FTSC would work hand in hand
 MG> with. Ideally, The FTSC would forward all new proposals to the IFS,
 MG> and the IFS would communicate to the FTSC, which out of those
 MG> proposals it feels is most important to elevate to standard status,
 MG> and also would communicate to the FTSC what needs to be changed from
 MG> past usages. The FTSC would then have a clear direction and clear
 MG> goals to work towards, and would not have to sort through dozens of
 MG> proposals and decide which ones have the most merit.

Just be careful that the IFS doesn't become the IFNA of past Fidonet
times.

Regards
Frank

http://pages.sbcglobal.net/flv
http://biseonline.com/r19

... BBS's are for the best, Inet is for the rest.

--- PPoint 3.01