BL> Yair... it's not a good compromise and it's no faster anyway. What
BL> I really wanted to do was write a string array in C. In Pascal, I can
BL> declare the array upfront as:
BL> names: array[0..128] of string[12];
char names[129][13]; ???
BL> Which reminds me... I forgot to limit the names array. Pacal does it
BL> for you with a range check; in C it just overflows. Bum!
C substitutes protection and slowness for a noose and speed.
Anyway, like I said, I'm using the "original". BFN. Paul.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|