WvV> Hi Brother,
 WvV> 
 WvV> On 2021-02-09 19:05:13, you wrote to All:
 WvV> 
 WvV> BR> @MSGID: 2:460/256 00000003
 WvV> BR> @PID: tg_BBS_v0.6.3
 WvV> BR> @CHRS: CP866 2
 WvV> BR> @TGUID: 534732808
 WvV> BR> @REPLYTO 2:460/256 534732808
 WvV> 
 WvV> A replyto kludge in echomail, that is the same as the senders nodenumber: Waste of space. ;)
 WvV> 
 WvV> BR> @RealName: Stas Mishchenkov 2:460/58
 WvV> 
 WvV> And no TZUTC kludge...
 WvV> 
 WvV> BR> Can I test tg_BBS right here? I would like to see how correctly
 WvV> BR> messages
 WvV> BR> are generated in Fido echo conferences now.
 WvV> 
 WvV> BR> --- tg BBS v0.6.3
 WvV> BR> SEEN-BY: 103/705 124/5016 154/10 203/0 221/0 6 229/101 240/5832 280/464
 WvV> BR> SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 288/100 292/854 8125 310/31 396/45 423/120 460/58
 WvV> BR> SEEN-BY: 460/256 777 1124 5858 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5054/30
 WvV> BR> @PATH: 460/256 58 280/464
 WvV> 
 WvV> Bye, Wilfred.

Is @TZUTC kludge now proper?


--- tg BBS v0.6.3