Hello Rick.

10 Nov 02 21:25, you wrote to me:

 RR>>>>> That is pretty clear to me then that the FTSC is
the authority
 RR>>>>> when it comes to nodelist flags.

 MG>>>> The Coordinators have /no/ say at all, eh...?

 RR>>> The ZC has to some extent. No other *C has.

 MG>> The ZC is an elected position. Who elects the ZC's?

 RR> No it isn't. It is only an elected position if the ZC and RC's agree
 RR> to have an election. In these circumstances usually the ZC (or any *C)
 RR> will ask others their thoughts.

 RR> According to policy, the RC's chose the ZC.

You just contradicted yourself. The ZC /is/ an elected position. The ZC's
are elected by the RC's.

 MG>> Regional Coordinator. You place far too much faith in the FTSC as
 MG>> an authority. They are (were) there to record what the *C's
 MG>> decide to use, and for no other reason.

 RR> Faith has nothing to do with it, read policy, its straight
 RR> forward.

I think you read it only the way you want to read it. It's pretty clear
that you place your own interpretations on both policy and the FTSC.

Enjoy your ignorance... I won't bother arguing with you any more.


--- GoldED/386 3.0.1-dam3