Hello Michael.

10 Nov 02 00:56, you wrote to me:

 RR>>>> That is pretty clear to me then that the FTSC is the authority
 RR>>>> when it comes to nodelist flags.

 MG>>> The Coordinators have /no/ say at all, eh...?

 RR>> The ZC has to some extent. No other *C has.

 MG> The ZC is an elected position. Who elects the ZC's?

No it isn't. It is only an elected position if the ZC and RC's agree to have
an election. In these circumstances usually the ZC (or any *C) will ask
others their thoughts.

According to policy, the RC's chose the ZC.

 MG> See Carol Shenkenberger's message. She would know, having been a
 MG> Regional Coordinator. You place far too much faith in the FTSC as an
 MG> authority. They are (were) there to record what the *C's decide to use,
 MG> and for no other reason.

Faith has nothing to do with it, read policy, its straight forward.



Cheers,
                Rick

... I know a good tagline when I steal one!

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5 - Debian/GNU