Hello Frank!
 FS> I just converted to boot manager after running OS/2 since
 FS> version 2.0 first came out using dual boot.  Heck, I never
 FS> booted to DOS anyway.  I've never had a requirement for
 FS> boot manager till now.  I decided to load up an OS/2 and
 FS> NT-DOS bootable system so I had to use boot manager.  I
 FS> repartitioned and installed everything under boot manager.
 FS> I like that now.  But I was served well for the last 5
 FS> years or so with dual-boot.
I just like keeping different versions of Os/2 (2.11, 3.0, and 4.0), as well 
as WFWG, and win 95 all bootable. Wife has to run Win 95 at work, so need to 
be able to look at it once in a while when she hits me with something that i 
haven't seen before in it, and i like having the different versions of Os/2 
around for basically the same reason. Nice to be able to boot up 2.11 or 3.0 
when someone hits ya with an off the wall question about one of the earlier 
versions. Would be totally lost without Boot Manager..
Marv Hubbard
... TAGLINE 2.000.000 Lemmings can't be wrong.
--- GoldED/2 3.00.Alpha4 UNREG
---------------