Bob Sewell discussing "Infinity"
with me...
ND>> That's right. Hmm. Your number is still infinity, is it not?
RT>> Yes, but it is a bigger one than you stated. Here is a bigger one than
RT>> Mark's: infinity^infinity
BS> If you want to compete with infinite numbers, then I've got you
BS> both
BS> beat with aleph-one. Before I can give a more formal definition,
BS> allow
BS> me to give some background. My apologies if you know this already; I
BS> don't mean to insult anyone's intelligence.
No insult here. I'm too dumb to understand it! But it is now marked KEEP for
further reference. Thanks for taking the time to type it in.
Relatif Tuinn
... A point to ponder: Was a stylist involved in the 2CV?
--- Spot 1.3a #1413
---------------
* Origin: 1+1=2 2+2=11 11+11=22 22+22=121 121+121=1012 (2:254/524.18)
|