Re: Low RPM, high torgue engine for cogeneration.
-> CH> I have a three horse Briggs from a factory sweeper (propane)
-> CH> belted to an older Chrysler alternator.  It's used as a battery
-> CH> charger away from the AC mains.  Stuck car in the woods sort
-> CH> of thing.
->
-> Three HP should easily handle any auto alternator, an alternator deli
-> 80 amps at 12volts should need less than 1.5 shaft HP.
The key is shaft HP.  No idea how the manufacturers rate these.  And
what the efficiency is, who knows?  This was put together with "junkbox"
parts over 20 years ago .
-> CH> It works pretty well, but the alternator takes more power at high
-> CH> ampere loads than the engine can supply.
->
-> Which may mean that either the chosen rpm is unsuited, or the engine
-> or off- tune. Then! there is the tendency of engine makers to lie abo
-> HP!! ;-)
That is possible.  All I can say with any certainty is that the load
from the alternator will stall the engine if it's putting out a lot of
amperes.  Don't forget it's running on propane, as well.  Some HP hit
from that because the engine is probably not optimized for propane.
-> CH> I have often considered using a V-8 automotive engine with much
-> CH> altered cam and ignition timing running at 540 RPM (PTO speed)
-> CH> to run a generator.  By careful selection of components, it
-> CH> would probably be made to be quite efficient at that speed.
-> CH> Maybe even run it off piped-in natural gas for co-generation.
->
-> Real David and Goliath! I suppose you are not proposing that an auto
-> be the partner!! But could you easily find a suitable generator??
Of course I wouldn't use an auto generator.  Nor even a large number
of them electrically isolated so they could be run in series for higher
voltage.  10 would give a very useable 140 VDC at 80 amps.  But I'm
not proposing that .  I was thinking about a standard synchronous
AC generator, sized appropriately.
-> For co- generation I suppose you would deserve a Good Citizen award.
-> Your initial costs and running costs would greatly exceed the
-> Utility credits for the energy you give them.  Cheers....ALEC
That's why it's all on paper (or bytes!), and not a wrench has been
turned.  To see if the project is practical.  So far, there has been
some opinions offered by folks with some good experience in the
field.  But I don't believe anyone has actually tried this.
I have been working with high-performance engines for 30+ years.
There is a tremendous body of work in improving efficiency in the
field.  Roller rockers, recently adopted for production by GM.
Roller tappets, also now used for production.  Lapped-end rings
for reduced leak-down.  Under 1%, rather than 3% normally found.
Synthetic oils.  The list goes on.  My thought was to gather all
these things in one place to see if the efficiency could be made
to work.  Natural gas is clean, and not hard on the engine.  Oil
stays clean for a *long* time.  And the proposed low RPM would
be easier on parts, and the ears in terms of vibration.
-c-
--- ViaMAIL!/WC4 v1.30 
---------------