| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in |
Hi Nicholas, On 2017-09-08 15:47:04, you wrote to me: WV>> It did see it and exported the message to Pauls outbound (if that WV>> isn't clear yet?)... NB> Very clear. However, the only reason it was scanned out is because his NB> FMail scanned _every_ area, rather than just what was in the echomail.jam. Nope. If I understood Paul correctly, it worked ok, scanning from echomail.jam! NB>>> I believe I had asked about some better logging when echomail.jam NB>>> fails too. ;) WV>> It's there... In the debug version. Just have to clean that up a bit WV>> for the production version. ;) NB> Did you give Paul a compiled setup with the updated fmail.c you gave me NB> that fixed linux paths in echomail.jam? Yes, it was freshly compiled. But it wasn't a debug version, so it didn't contain the extra logging... Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 103/705 154/10 203/0 229/426 240/5832 249/303 261/38 280/464 5003 SEEN-BY: 280/5555 292/624 854 310/31 423/120 633/0 267 280 281 412 640/384 SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 2320/100 @PATH: 280/464 712/848 633/280 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.