In a message of 13 Apr 98 Ivy Iverson wrote to me:
PF>> `reconstructions'. In ten minutes with PhotoShop, I can reconstruct
PF>> the face on the Sphinx to look exactly like Elvis Presley. Would the
II> and I believe this was what I saw, was to take careful measurements of
II> the object to be "reconstructed," calculate the rate that the surface
I take your point and accept what you say.
II> was worn away, then in the computer, "reverse the erosion." As a check,
II> since the erosion rate is known, the process can be reversed, starting
II> with the "new" object, then eroding it in the computer to see if it
II> returns to what it is currently.
It should always do that because the `unerode' will use the same algorithms
as the `erode'.
It> About the only thing that can't be reconstructed on the Sphynx is the
IT> nose, unless a profile picture or drawing can be found which showed
IT> it before the damage occured.
Wasn't the nose knocked off by French soldiers doing cannon practice? If it
was, a drawing may yet be found. But what's happening about excavating around
it? Anything yet?
I am slightly inclined to the idea that the Egyptians never had the means to
build the Sphinx or the pyramids, and that they are older than Pharaoic
culture.
-patrick
--- Spot 1.3a #1649
(3:772/235.3)
---------------
* Origin: ====Patrick Ford====Auckland, NEW ZEALAND=====Fidonet:
|