It's 05 Aug 97  23:49:56,
We'll return to Jun Martin and Frostbyte's
discussion of OS/2 switch...
 Fr> question is has anyone done any comparisons between win3.11 and  win95
 Fr> and os/2 on their own machines?  I understand that os/2 can be more
 JM> Oh, sure.  Win95 is way beloooooooow OS/2 especially in terms of
 JM> communication.  Win3.x is worse than Win95.
I've had a fiddle too.  OS/2 is by far more flexible and usable than
either form of Windows for BBS systems.  Perhaps that may change, when
Win32 BBS packages become more common (there are a few though).  For DOS
based sysops looking for something better, OS/2 is the way to go.
I tried Win3.11, when I needed more networking capabilities than DOS,
but various parts of the system wouldn't run.  OS/2 runs everything at
least as well as DOS, and offers extra features as well (e.g. easier
Internet integration).
... When there's a will, I want to be in it.
--- FMail/386 1.02
---------------