ששש Quoting Jun Martin from a message to Frostbyte ששש
 Fr> had to  wipe the thing.  I run a bbs (just two nodes) on a AMD 586-133,
 Fr> 8M RAM and the  system just SLOOOOOOWED and now it's back to the ol'
 Fr> DOS 6.20-Win 3.11 setup  (this is the preface, the question is coming
JM> You like Win3.x better than Win95 for a 2-node BBS????  
Yeah.....the 3.11 has a lot less overhead and doesn't hide as much from the 
user.  As we've heard in the os-debate echo, it's just a shell....so is 
win95, but 95 is such a big shell it covers up everything.  And when a lockup 
or other problem happens it's hard to tell where it came from.
JM> Oh, sure.  Win95 is way beloooooooow OS/2 especially in terms of 
JM> communication.  Win3.x is worse than Win95.
I'm in the process of trying out OS/2 now (not yet but sooooon!).  I haven't 
had many problems since i switched back to the old 3.11...i would use 
Desqview but my copy got corrupted.  
--- Telegard v3.02/mL
---------------