| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: SyncTERM users? |
On 12/15/18, Rob Swindell said the following... RS> Anyone here use SyncTERM for CBM/PETSCII emulation when connecting to RS> C64 or C128 boards? RS> RS> If yes, I have a request of you: compare the SyncTERM v1.0 C64 or C128 RS> "screen modes" with those in the current v1.1b (beta) and let us (the RS> SyncTERM dev-team) know *which* color representation best reflects what RS> you would expect to see in a CBM/PETSCII terminal. RS> RS> Here are some screen shot comparisons (C64 screen mode) if you just want RS> to peek and comment quickly: RS> SyncTERM 1.0 screen shot: RS> https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApZPvWcrEaRQvJl-cu1s0ogYogzkYg RS> SyncTERM 1.1b (current) screen shot: RS> https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApZPvWcrEaRQvJl9cli-mEJjXu9k4g RS> I just started using it recently (Been and still am a NetRunner user) I never could get 1.0 to emulate it at least without the wrong fonts. I can use 1.1 though and although I am not used to the larger font it runs pretty well and looks pretty clean. I use it to log into my Commodore BBS' so I can see what is being transmitted and what I am receiving and they are pretty much the exact same.. Not sure if this is what you were looking for.. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)* Origin: The Wrong Number Family Of BBS' - Wrong Number ][ (1:267/157) SEEN-BY: 57/0 153/250 267/800 317/2 393/68 633/0 267 280 281 412 712/848 770/0 SEEN-BY: 770/1 3 100 340 772/0 1 210 500 @PATH: 267/157 800 770/1 633/280 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.