Hello Frostbyte.
30 Jul 97 01:09, Frostbyte wrote to All:
 F> After a couple of weeks after my ..er...uh...'upgrade' to win95, i've
 F> had to wipe the thing.  I run a bbs (just two nodes) on a AMD 586-133,
 F> 8M RAM and the system just SLOOOOOOWED and now it's back to the ol'
That is the exact setup I run over here (plus and extra 8 megs ram, and my 
CPU 
is clocked up to a 160 instead of 133). Nice choice! =-)
 F> DOS 6.20-Win 3.11 setup (this is the preface, the question is coming
 F> up).  The system performs well with this system but i have lately been
 F> getting up on the os/2 info web pages and it sounds like everyone in
 F> the world should be running Warp.  Even the more 'conservative' or
 F> objective pages seem to lean towards os/2 over win3.11 or win95.  My
 F> question is has anyone done any comparisons between win3.11 and win95
 F> and os/2 on their own machines?  I understand that os/2 can be more
I have ran all of the above setup sand OS/2 is by far the best/fastest/stable
setup for my system that is out! I run OS/2 4.0 on my AMD 5X86 16 megs ram 
with
no problems... It runs for days without a reboot (Which usualy is caused by
something that I changed) ;-)
 F>  difficult to setup but in my experience, anything worth running
 F> usually is.  I have read all the technical specs and such and i'm
 F> seriously looking into switching to Warp 3.0.  I don't run a lot of
 F> windows applications, mostly dos ones for the BBS (i still do command
 F> line file moves and such:)  Any info is greatly appreciated...
Take a look at it, and ask any questions that you may have. You will be very
happy with your OS/2 setup. Guarenteed!
     Arthur Stark  [ art.stark@juno.com ]  Team Allfix (Universal)
... * I have a scummy card in my system.
--- GoldED/2 3.00.Alpha5+ * ProBoard * FastEcho/2 * T-Mail/2
---------------