Hello Ross.

01 Aug 04 15:17, you wrote to me:

 MB>> Maybe because I do not like being told that "I do not know
 MB>> technology" or "have not been in Fidonet long enough" ..

 RC> .. the rest of us should regard you as the father of Fidonet?

Sorry but I have no interest in debating things with you that I never said.

 RC> .. I have been and noticeably absent from all that in many months, ..

I am pleased to see my occasional rant is enough to keep your interest in Fido.

 MB>> .. overlooking anything that they do which may be offensive to
 MB>> others.

 RC> Oh so you think I am sucking up to Robert in this instance?

What is good enough for one should be good enough for all.

 RC> Thats odd, I made a echo I had available for Bjorns ..

I notice that you tread *very* carefully when you deal with "certain
people".

 MB>> Fidonet is not going to get very far with people like Robert
 MB>> (maybe even you) at the helm.

 RC> Who says I am at the helm or Robert is at the helm of anything?

Two former regional coordinators who are always ready and eager to jump on
others for their apparent lack of technical prowess.  You both are welcome
to to break my balls when I am wrong; just do your homework first.  :-)

 RC> You tend to alienate more people than you unite.

I tend to tell people exactly what I think and not what they want to hear.

 MB>> .. response might have been, "I believe you are wrong but I will
 MB>> check."

 RC> Not unreasonable, why didnt you suggest this to Robert instead of
 RC> taking the swipe at him?

Why don't you ask him why he took a swipe at me?  ;-)

 RC> I wasnt commenting on Roberts accuracy, I only comment on your
 RC> negativity, thats it, the long and short of it, nothing more..

You dance so nicely now.  Just where did you get those new shoes?  :-)

Matt

e-mail: matt [at] thunderdome.ws | icq: 16568532 | yahoo: mbedynek

---