TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: os2prog
to: All
from: Craig Swanson
date: 1994-11-21 22:22:28
subject: Named pipe problems

I have a program that I've been developing that has been successfully using
named pipes for interprocess communications on OS/2 2.1.  Now on OS/2
3.0,sometimes the named pipe communication fails in a way that seems to
indicate that their might be some kind of buffer size problem.  So I went
to go look in the documentation for DosCreateNPipe() to verify that I was
passing the write parameters. But there is a problem -- the documentation
does not agree on the order of the parameters!

The OS/2 3.0 toolkit lists the input buffer size before the output buffer
size.  But the example code does the opposite.

The OS/2 2.1 toolkit lists the output buffer size before the input buffer
size.  The example code agrees with this.

I was making calls according to the parameter order of the OS/2 2.1
toolkit. On OS/2 2.0, 2.1, and 2.11 it worked fine.  But now it doesn't
always work properly.

Did IBM change the parameters for DosCreateNPipe()?  Which is the correct
order for the parameters in OS/2 3.0?


--- Maximus/2 2.01wb

* Origin: OS/2 Connection {at} Mira Mesa, CA (1:202/354)
SEEN-BY: 12/2442 54/54 620/243 624/50 632/348 640/820 690/660 711/409 410 413
SEEN-BY: 711/430 807 808 809 934 942 949 712/353 623 713/888 800/1
@PATH: 202/354 301 1 3615/50 229/2 12/2442 711/409 54/54 711/808 809 934

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.