RT> Scientists never use a theory to support anything. It is just that - a
RT> theory.  As to empirical support, we have millions of bones and fossils.
RT> Where did they come from?
ac> Mostly from animals that drowned.
No, silly, very few fossilized remains were the result of any kind of
drowning.  That's just your cult masters whispering into your ears.  Most
fossils are from animals which lived and died within shallow inland water.
Of the air-breathing reptiles and mammals, predation at the base of
hillsides which then covered the remains is how they became fossilized.
You might want to learn how fossilization takes place, dear.  I know that
it's against your cult's monetary dictates for you to review anything
even the slightest bit educational but you might check out Bill Nye, the
Science Guy on PBS (argh!  I said a bad word, huh?) as there is a very
good description of how fossilization happens.
And it's taken slowly enough even for Creationists to understand.
RT> As you'll inevitably just refuse to except any evolutionist argument,
RT> then maybe you'd like to provide some evidence for the creationist
RT> argument instead?
ac> Not only do you refuse to except any Creationist argument, but
ac> if you're the least like a typical Evolutionist, you want to
ac> censor Creationist arguments so that no one will have the
ac> opportunity to except any Creationist argument.
That's curious.  You some how "forgot" to provide any evidence for any of
your Creationist claims.  You also seem to have forgotten to provide a
testable hypothesis for your freakish claims.
Perhaps it got lost along the way.  Yeah.  That's probably it.
---
---------------