AC> Evolutionists don't merely believe that change happens, but that
AC> natural processes can lead to an indefinite increase in complexity
AC> -- a
RT> It not only can but has. Look at the world around you. We have
RT> species ranging from micro-bacteria to blue whales.  The evidence
RT> speaks for itself.
ac> Evolutionists believe
You might want to name some of these scientists who "believe" the fact of
evolution.  More accurately, scientists accept the directly observed
phenomena.  It's no more subject to belief or disbelief than the fact of
gravitation is subject to belief or disbelief.
Certainly scientific facts are subject to willful denial but that's one of
the aspects of religious humanity well covered in High School history class.
Some how you missed it.
ac> that some simple organism appeared
No, no scientist says that.  Funny how you cultists never come up with
any names to attribute to your straw men lies.
Scientists state that self-replicatring molecular arangements developed
about half a billion years after the Earth cooled enough to support the
formation of amino acids.
Your masters are lying to you and, like any unthinking robot, you have
been prepetuating your master's lies.
ac> and that this simple organism gradually developed
ac> into more complex organisms, and ultimately to humans.
What makes you think that humanity is the ultimate?  Evolution is, as you
would know if your masters let you research the subject, an unguided
phenomena.
ac> Now, can you identify any clear example of the complexity
ac> of any type of organism increasing in complexity?
Can you pick up a paleontological text book at your local library and
read it?
---
---------------