>> FSC-46 does not cover version identifiers below 1.00, so
".89" may 
>> be considered non-conformant.

...

MK> Note the part that states: "Only the relevant part of the version 
MK> should be included".  So I think that I follow the spec on that 
MK> account.

Yes, I believe you are correct.


>> Your "c" suffix is non-conformant as it does not designate alpha, 
>> beta or gamma status.

MK> That's right.  I'm going to fix it soon.  If I understand the 
MK> FSC-0046.005 right, the following PID would be correct:

MK> ^APID: TPCS .89b5

MK> It translates to:

MK> TPCS version 0.89beta build 5.

I cannot say, since FTSC-ALL.L69 only has FSC-0046.003 which does
not permit a numberic value after the Alpha/Beta/Gamma status.

andrew

--- Msgedsq/2 3.05