Hello Frostbyte!
Wednesday July 30 1997 01:09, Frostbyte wrote to All:
 F> question is has anyone done any comparisons between win3.11 and win95
 F> and os/2 on their own machines?  I understand that os/2 can be more
Yep, sure have. I've run DOS/Desqview, DOS/WFWG, and neither compares with 
OS/2. OS/2 is much more stable than either of the others. Why? Darned if I 
know.. It works, and that is what I'm more concerned about.
 F> seriously looking into switching to Warp 3.0.  I don't run a lot of
 F> windows applications, mostly dos ones for the BBS (i still do command
 F> line file moves and such:)  Any info is greatly appreciated...
I do the same thing. And for what it's worth, I can do anything under OS/2 
that I could when running DOS.. And probably a lot more. I'm using a 
486DX4/100 with 32 meg and right now I've got three lines up, the mail 
reader, a couple of status windows, and nothing slows down.
I really think it's easier to setup than Win95, as I've also tried that and 
done the same thing you did..
Have a good day!!
Mike
Internet bcomber@cave.fido.de
---
---------------