Hello Dale!

 DS> Yes -- the intent was primarily to make changes in the manner that P4 can
 DS> be amended. Once that has been done, then other issues can be discussed
 DS> and proposals drafted one issue at a time (perhaps in parallel) *AND* can
 DS> be brought to a vote more easily.

Then it is ok for me ans I will support it.

 DS> The change to 1.3.1 had already been proposed previously as a single
 DS> issue change -- but there was never any response to it.  Since it is an
 DS> obvious and non controversial change, we included it.

This makes sense. Fine.

greetings, Werner

--- GED 3.0.1-dam3