Winston Smith (1:323/120) wrote to Steven Horn at 02:54 on 20 Mar 2003:

 WS> I made that mistake, as well !
 WS> A couple of things that I have seen other boards do:

 WS> (1:17/67) 

 WS> (1:17/67) 

 WS> I believe that Swills BBS took the former approach when it switched
 WS> to a mailer only status.  (It may have switched back by now.)

A nodelist listing is supposed to be FTSC compliant and although part of my
listing is problematic, the domain name listed in the system name is not. 
If I wanted to run under another name, I could by using the IBN: field and
I may consider that.  But what is there is FTSC compliant and I see no
immediate reason to change it.
 
Take care,

Steven Horn (steven_a_horn{at}yahoo.ca)
Moderator, ALASKA_CHAT 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+