RJT> TW> Actualy in the Server markey they are looking over their Shoulder.

RJT>That's funny,  as it seems to assume that m$ has the lead in the server mar
RJT> and they don't.  Not by a long shot.

I ASSUME little becauee you know what Felix Unger aid about that.
MicroSoft IS wrooind about the erosion of theri Market share of the
Server market being eroded by the increasing popularity of LINUX.
And the FEAR is Real as with Hewlett Packard and IBM jumping into the
LINUS server market one can see that MS is in trouble.


RJT>This assumes that the home market as m$ has defined it is where it's at, an
RJT>what should be targeted,  and I'm not so sure that this is the case.


There are one hell of a lot of Home Users out there. Adn most are Totaly
technicaly chalendged as far as Computers go. THAT is one Attractive
Market.
WHY do you think MS used soem dirty tricks to drive theri competition
into non existance. Because it is a BIG money market. Little margin on
each individual machine but the Volume more then makes up for it.
OF course Apply shot themselves in the foot by going with the Maximum
Profit on each sale.
---
 þ SLMR 2.1a þ This note from El Cajon California USA