Bob Short wrote in a message to Thom Lacosta:

TL> Then it would appear that no matter what changes are made to P4,
TL> it's still
TL> something that we ultimately do not control...any IC could
TL> overturn existin
TL> policy.

 BS> Ultimate control is not what we want nor need.  A document such as
 BS> this must have some flexibility, or (as has been pointed out) it
 BS> becomes too cumbersome and politically technical.

 BS> The best we can produce is one that contains adequate checks and
 BS> balances.  The RCC is the check for the IC.

It's all over my pea-sized brain....Guess I'll have to see what happens in
the real world(If I can be so bold as to use that term to describe a
Fidonet situation).


cya,
thom
baltimoremd{at}baltimoremd.com
http://www.tlchost.net/echolist/ 
--- GEcho 1.20/Pro