| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | binkley xe |
Hello Roy! Monday December 23 2002 04:06, Roy J. Tellason wrote to Robert Bull: RJT> I could probably count the number of times that people have connected RJT> with such a bidirectional protocol without running out of fingers... Same here. Back in the days of POTS echomail transfers, bidirectional support made sense. It basically gave you free outgoing while picking up your incoming. With most people using the internet in some form for echomail transfers today, bidirectional support is no longer nearly as important as it used to be. Andrew ---* Origin: Bits & Bytes BBS * V.Everything! * 860/535-4284 (1:320/119) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 320/119 10/3 106/2000 1 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.