From: "Mark" 

You may be surprised at this, but I think it's time, let's return them all
to their points of origin.

With the caveat that we continue to hold the ones that request not to be
released back to from whence they came, or if their country doesn't want
them, as it sounds like Afghanistan doesn't. 

"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
news:44483a6c{at}w3....
> Sowhat is the plan for Guantanamo detainees?
>
> http://www.forbes.com/technology/feeds/ap/2006/04/20/ap2685670.html
>
> A chorus of complaints against the Bush administration erupted Thursday
> after the Pentagon released a previously secret list of the names and
> nationalities of 558 people held at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo
> Bay.
>
> Britain said its citizen should be freed after being held for years
> without charges. Afghanistan's peace and reconciliation commission vowed
> to send a delegation to the prison to make sure Afghans are not being
> mistreated. China demanded custody of a group of Muslim separatists so it
> can prosecute them on terrorism charges.
>
> About 490 detainees from about 40 countries are now at the base. The Red
> Cross - the only outside agency the United States has allowed to visit the
> detainees - previously had access to the list but was not allowed to make
> it public.
>
> Bahrain's Human Rights Society said it petitioned the U.S. Embassy for the
> release of three remaining Bahraini detainees and for guarantees that
> their treatment does not violate international law.
>
> The official, who is familiar with his country's efforts to win freedom
> for detainees, said Pakistan had thought seven of its citizens were at
> Guantanamo when actually there are 22.
>
> "It is a fact that they have been concealing information from us about our
> people detained at Guantanamo Bay," he told AP.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5