TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: binkley
to: Richard Webb
from: Dan Far
date: 1996-07-03 15:14:48
subject: Binkley VS. FD

*** Quoting Richard Webb to Dan Far dated 07-01-96 ***
> I'm wondering if you're using the proper verbs for BInkley.cfg for 
> emsi, 
> such as pickupall, etc.  
> It sounds to me like more of your problems are in your message packer 
> than 
> Binkley problems.  
> Maybe somebody who uses Geco with Binkley can give you some help.  
> I"m not familiar with it.  
> 
> We used fmail and squish with Binkley and our tag board. If you can 
> stay 
> with *.msg, try out squish. 
> You can find a copy mjust about anywhere.  
> 
> Sorry I couldn't be of more help.  

         Dearest helper,

    I have SQUISH and the binkley docs (finally!)
    .. I have went through all the verbs listed, 
    and I am using the most that fit my configuration...
    Everything seems to be working except that 
    sqiush, gecho, AND fmail all put mail in the wrong
    directory, and the first thing I did was go to
    their configurations but they still refuse to 
    scan and put it in the C:\BINK\OUT (dir) ..
    and I am running TWO nets ...
    Should I have two outbound directories?


--- T.A.G. 2.7c Standard

* Origin: The Abacus * v.32/v.42 * (517)645-7343 * Node 1 (1:159/100)
SEEN-BY: 50/99 157/534 620/243 622/419 623/630 625/100 626/660 665 667 668
SEEN-BY: 626/670 633/2 640/820 711/401 409 410 413 416 430 501 808 809 934
SEEN-BY: 711/955 712/515 713/888 714/906 800/1
@PATH: 159/100 3615/50 396/1 157/110 534 626/660 711/401 808 934

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.