| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Binkley VS. FD |
*** Quoting Richard Webb to Dan Far dated 07-01-96 ***
> I'm wondering if you're using the proper verbs for BInkley.cfg for
> emsi,
> such as pickupall, etc.
> It sounds to me like more of your problems are in your message packer
> than
> Binkley problems.
> Maybe somebody who uses Geco with Binkley can give you some help.
> I"m not familiar with it.
>
> We used fmail and squish with Binkley and our tag board. If you can
> stay
> with *.msg, try out squish.
> You can find a copy mjust about anywhere.
>
> Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
Dearest helper,
I have SQUISH and the binkley docs (finally!)
.. I have went through all the verbs listed,
and I am using the most that fit my configuration...
Everything seems to be working except that
sqiush, gecho, AND fmail all put mail in the wrong
directory, and the first thing I did was go to
their configurations but they still refuse to
scan and put it in the C:\BINK\OUT (dir) ..
and I am running TWO nets ...
Should I have two outbound directories?
--- T.A.G. 2.7c Standard
* Origin: The Abacus * v.32/v.42 * (517)645-7343 * Node 1 (1:159/100)SEEN-BY: 50/99 157/534 620/243 622/419 623/630 625/100 626/660 665 667 668 SEEN-BY: 626/670 633/2 640/820 711/401 409 410 413 416 430 501 808 809 934 SEEN-BY: 711/955 712/515 713/888 714/906 800/1 @PATH: 159/100 3615/50 396/1 157/110 534 626/660 711/401 808 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.