From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

George Sherwood wrote:
> On Tue, 02 May 2006 23:32:42 +0200, Phil Payne wrote:
>
>>>> And I can't think of any other result of these bully-boy
tactics than
>> the
>>>> rest of the kids in the playground ganging up to pull the USA down.
>>> And you have been saying this for how long?  Isn't going to happen any
>>> time soon.
>> Looks like Plan B:
>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/02/AR2006050200
952.html
>>
>> "WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With no clear sign the United States can win
>> U.N. support for sanctions against Iran, the Bush administration said on
>> Tuesday it could work instead with like-minded nations to punish Tehran
>> for its nuclear programs."
>>
>> I wonder how many "like-minded nations" it will find. 
Bliar is likely
>> to think: "Once bitten, twice shy."
>>
>> And what incredible arrogance allows the USA to "punish"
other nations?
>> Jesus.
>
> And where do you come up with it is only the USA?
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060502/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpoliticsun
>
> PARIS (AFP) - All five permanent members of the UN Security Council and
> Germany agree  Iran's nuclear programme "is not compatible with the demands
> of the international community," a French official said after envoys
> wrapped up a meeting in Paris. Senior political directors from Britain,
> China, France, Russia and United States, as well as Germany, "all showed
> their concern over the development of this programme," said foreign
> ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei.
>  He added that they agreed to pursue discussions on the issue at the
>  foreign minister level in New York next Monday -- advancing by a day a
>  scheduled gathering -- with the aim of reaching a "firm" decision.
>
>
> This is all wrapped up in diplomacy at this time and you are blind to the
> fact it isn't only the USA that believes Iran is in violation and
> shouldn't be allowed to develop nuclear weapons.
>
> George

ROFLMAO.....So the 5 "official nuclear powers" think it's only OK
for them to have mega-WMD.

No change there then.

Hey how about if the 5 nuclear powers said that possession of nukes was per
se "compatible with the demands of the international community,"
coz the vast bulk of the "international community ain't "nuclear
powers" & nuclear bombs are nasty things so....

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5