Michiel;

-=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Victor Sudakov <=-

 MvV> A tunnel is good, native IPv6 is better. I noticed it too when I used
 MvV> tunnels. IPv6 over the tunnel is significantky slower than IPv4. Up to
 MvV> 50% slower. Native IPv6 is always preferable so we we should all keep
 MvV> perstering our ISPs about IPv6.

If  you were getting that much of a slowdown, something else was going on.
Granted the MTU is slightly and I mean slightly less than native IPv6 or
IPv4, but it's only by 20 bytes/1500 byte packet. Doing the math, this does
NOT equal a 50% lag. Maybe the issue is that your ISP's path to your IPv6
tunnel provider is not an optimum path? Mine is just a couple hops away
so it's not an issue for me.

 MvV> As I said: native is preferable, but a tunnel is better than no IPv6 at
 MvV> all.

This is true.

... So eager to play, so reluctant to admit it
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52