>  RA>There's only one test so far - it does "for i = 1 to
1000:?i,i*i:next
 >  RA>and "times" (a=ti:for i ....:?ti-a) the process.
 >  RA>I'd personally like as many different tests as possible.

 >  Yep, that only really determines the 6510 emulators speed,
 > doesnt really cover things like screen refresh rates, or how
 > accurate the 6526 timings are. But who needs an emulator anyway?

Exactly.  But I was asked how fast the emulators were, and that was a quick
way of finding out!  :)

 >  I saw on my first adventure into comp.sys.cbm a great quote -
 > some ibm lamer said something like "..but an emulator is just as
 > good as the real thing", to which someone replied "Yeah, and
 > masturbation is as good as sex!"

To many of the people on c.s.c I think masturbation IS sex!  :)

 >  RA>So, go ahead and write some point software for the 128 then!  :)

 >  Yeah, and some for the 64 while you are at it (:

Go for it!

 >  btw (the main reason I'm writing this message) - I saw your
 > post on comp.sys.cbm about 64NET. As you may have guessed I just
 > found my way into the internet, through a compuserve gateway..

Who's paying?  Compu$erve is well named!  :(

 > Good to see someone I recognize there - writing 4 page long
 > messages as usual (-: Still have to get around to posting

Who, me?  :)

 > something - have no idea what my internet address would be
 > though!

Try sending me some mail R.Alphey{at}dce.vic.gov.au and I'll let you know what
your address is.  Hmmmm - I know what your address will be.

If your compu$erve account is 74231,684 (as I assume compu$erve accounts
are), then your internet address is 74231.684{at}compuserve.com

 > btw, I've got the 64net files now, might make the cable this
 > weekend & check it out. btw what's the rego?

It's $50.

I think you'll be pretty impressed with the software!

--- FMail 0.94