From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

George Sherwood wrote:
> On Fri, 05 May 2006 01:43:19 +1200, Don Hills wrote:
>
>
>> What, indeed. "People" don't always agree with their Government.
>
> So why aren't they upset with their Government?   Why does this show up as
> anti-Americanism?  As you said, they have stood up to the USA before with
> the ban, why not this time also if they feel it is so wrong what the USA
> was asking?
>
>> http://www.listener.co.nz
>>
>> NZ's leading current affairs magazine.
>>
>> This week's cover story, with "thumbs down"
Stars'n'Stripes logo: "The new
>> Kiwi anti-Americanism: What's upping the anti?"
>
> I don't think any one country could be a sole superpower and not begin to
> generate bad publicity.  As I have looked through history, I would venture
> to say that no hyper-power has acted as restrained.  The come back is that
> times have changed and people have changed, maybe so, but I don't think so
> much.  As I have read history when there has been a sole superpower,
> much of the world has been upset with them and against them.  It was just
> more localized.  Now is is spread around a much wider area.
>
> Also personally I don't see that we are closer to nuclear war then ever.
> If there are nukes used it is going to be by a rogue against the US not by
> the US.
>
> George

Chuckle....I note not a single nuclear power is recognizing reality which
is that the only way to stop that is for all to become merely "nuclear
capable".

Boys & their toys.

The nuclear powers are in breach of the NPT but noone is calling them on it
coz guess what....oh yes the "veto wielding" members of the UN
are the...waaaait for iiiit.....official nuclear powers...


What sad hypocrisy.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5